Kathmandu: In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of Nepal, presided over by Justice Ishwar Prasad Khatiwada and Justice Kumar Regmi, delivered a thorough verdict on the case involving Prime Minister Pushpakamal Dahal. The case was presented to the court by Senior Advocate Dinesh Tripathi from Ward No. 10 of Kathmandu Metropolitan City.
Key Points from the Court’s Verdict:
Constitutional Authority and Legal Process:
The court reiterated its constitutional authority (Article 128) to interpret the constitution and the law. Emphasizing the adherence to legal processes, the verdict underscores the significance of justice being served within established norms.
Prime Minister’s Legal Dispute:
The document delves into the specifics of the legal dispute involving Prime Minister Pushpakamal Dahal. It analyzes evidence and legal arguments to arrive at a nuanced decision regarding the case.
Judicial Independence and Impartiality:
The court stressed its independence and commitment to impartiality, clarifying that judicial decisions remain uninfluenced by external pressures, political considerations, or media reports.
Duration of Judicial Proceedings:
Acknowledging the complexity of the case, the court justified the duration of the judicial process, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive examination. It underlined the importance of maintaining discipline throughout the proceedings.
Media Reporting and Public Perception:
The verdict addresses the role of media in reporting legal proceedings, urging responsible reporting. It emphasizes the media’s duty to present accurate facts and avoid sensationalism that could impact public perception.
Prime Minister’s Acquittal:
Prime Minister Pushpakamal Dahal has been acquitted of the charges brought against him. The court’s decision, rooted in a meticulous examination of the case, upholds due process and principles of justice.
This verdict holds significance in Nepal’s legal and political landscape, as Prime Minister Pushpakamal Dahal is cleared of the charges. The court’s decision reaffirms the judiciary’s commitment to upholding the rule of law, ensuring a fair legal process, and contributing to the transparency of the legal system. The detailed document is available publicly, fostering confidence in the judicial process.
